My personal opinion is that most men are more comfortable demonstrating value by spending money than not spending money… because they simply don’t know what else to do.

is very true, and also because no one else has taught them what the alternatives are.

“Viva Las Vegas” I saw that one and remember that scene.

They need to test this in the field with real Gold-diggers. I think the real way to screen them out is to say you are an unemployed avant-garde novelist working on developing a new style you call Dada Fiction.

I used to work at a used car dealership that specialized in sports & muscle cars. I drove a lot of hot cars around to get specialty work done on them. The only people who checked me out were young boys. Hot women never noticed the cars. I’d only recommend a hot car for pickup if you are an old Gay guy looking for young boys.

There is an Elvis movie where he is a racecar driver. Ann Margaret finally brings him lunch at the shop, which he is not overly pleased about, to get some attention. A lot of truth there.

I bet women view a 911 as a distraction from what a man should really be interested in; her.

Silver

Lol, I had to lookup “Z8″

Two acquaintances of (good friends of my girlfriend) are total naturals. And they very often pick up the tab. For everyone.

But they never, ever do this to impress a particular woman. They do it because that’s what they do.

Picking up a several hundred dollar tab in San Fran demonstrates very high value… as long as there is no supplication involved.

Another guy I worked with many years ago bought a Z8, but still couldn’t get laid. He was demonstrating lameness, not value. At some point, he may have found a golddigger somewhere, I’ve lost track of him.

I think a lot of good points have been raised here. Regarding #2, what do you think of those guys who say it’s “masculine” to pay for everything and to demonstrate their ability to take care of her financially (which is different than supporting pregnant wives or families)? While it’s true there are gold diggers, isn’t it true that there are men who want to play that role? Indeed, some women would maintain that it’s in their nature to be on the receiving end of such largesse. Thoughts?

In any case, I’m glad Lenton made the point that a woman can marry a financial provider, but bear children sired by another man. This might be why they say that women find muscular/rugged guys (even) more attractive when they’re ovulating.

http://tinyurl.com/csc3a3